I’d vote against this as well under my current understanding of this proposal.
This seems to be proposing a non-trivial departure from how the Index Coop does metagovernance today from INDEX Holders decide to Individuals decide.
Given that, it seems like a higher-level strategy outlining your vision would be an important precursor to a decision on a single protocol.
Can you two share your larger vision & why this proposed change of direction is a net-positive for INDEX stakeholders?
Two side notes
- This is not to say that metagov is perfect today. Luckily, folks are indeed focusing on it i.e. Framework for Meta-Governance
- I wonder what other ways the Coop community can support you and Regan in your CREAM endeavors, be more active in CREAM governance, and deepen that relationship.