# $CREAM MetaGovernance Delegation **URL:** https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/cream-metagovernance-delegation/1459 **Category:** Uncategorized **Created:** [6 May 2021 18:15 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/cream-metagovernance-delegation/1459 "2021-05-06T18:15:36Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 4
### Author: ![anon10525910](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/97f17d/32.png) [@anon10525910](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/anon10525910) #### Post date: [7 May 2021 05:18 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/cream-metagovernance-delegation/1459/4 "2021-05-07T05:18:22Z")
I’d vote `against` this as well under my current understanding of this proposal. This seems to be proposing a non-trivial departure from how the Index Coop does metagovernance today from **INDEX Holders decide** to **Individuals decide.** Given that, it seems like a higher-level strategy outlining your vision would be an important precursor to a decision on a single protocol. Can you two share your larger vision & why this proposed change of direction is a net-positive for INDEX stakeholders? Two side notes - This is not to say that metagov is perfect today. Luckily, folks are indeed focusing on it i.e. [Framework for Meta-Governance](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/framework-for-meta-governance/1075) - I wonder what other ways the Coop community can support you and Regan in your CREAM endeavors, be more active in CREAM governance, and deepen that relationship. --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/cream-metagovernance-delegation/1459)._