Hey everyone,
Great discussion that is actually anticipating some things @cedrick and I have been talking about as well. It’s great to see that our thinking is aligned here. However, the difference between a meta-governance group and this proposal (at least how I imagine it) is that, with a meta-gov committee:
- Index holders are left with the decision to keep their vote, or to delegate it to a meta-gov committee,
With this proposal:
- Index holders do not have that choice anymore, as CREAM voting power will be fully delegated
I’m personally in favor for the committee model for now. However, there is still the discussion whether this is actually technically feasible. As far as I understand IIP38, we cannot separate meta-gov from governance voting. Hence, the meta-gov committee would also be given the voting power on non-meta-governance votes (e.g. IIPs). The model proposed here on the other hand, would allow for meta-gov only votes, while index holders keep their voting power on index governance.
Keen to understand whether there are other ways to do this, allowing for delegation plus a separation of meta-gov and non-meta-gov