Hello,
Actually, I would like to withdraw this suggestion. Capturing the underlying yeild is certainly a target, but the DPIacc index adds all sorts of complexity and dependencies on other protocols. In addition it would cannabalise our attention from DPI growth.
see here:
Or some more random thoughts for @overanalyser
The Secret Master plan proposes a target of getting a single set (DPI) to $50 M AUM.
I don’t like this goal, it sets an arbitrary value while ignoring the wider market valuation, something that we have little influence over.
So, I would like to propose a new Target: 1%
Doesn’t sound very ambitious does it?
OK, how about: INDEX coop $DPI will sustainably control 1% of the market
So, $DPI will control 1% of the circulating tokens that make up …
Also known as more rambling from overanalyser… Sorry, I’m on a roll.
They say a week is a long time in crytpto. I’m beginning to know the feeling.
Last weekend, I wrote an online proposal to form an accumulating version of $DPI . I now think this is wrong.
On Tuesday, I wrote the “road to 1% .” which was my view on one way that $DPI AUV could vary over the near future and what we as the INDEXcoop should focus on at each stage.
Following that I was involved in the governance and growth calls a…
DPI as a productive asset
The 2% cash grab
For a progression of the idea
1 Like