# \[Discussion\] Centralization in Index Coop Governance **URL:** https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/discussion-centralization-in-index-coop-governance/3425 **Category:** Tokenomics **Created:** [14 December 2021 05:11 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/discussion-centralization-in-index-coop-governance/3425 "2021-12-14T05:11:22Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 10
### Author: ![lee0007](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/gov.indexcoop.com/lee0007/32/1426_2.png) [@lee0007](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/lee0007) #### Post date: [20 December 2021 04:08 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/discussion-centralization-in-index-coop-governance/3425/10 "2021-12-20T04:08:43Z")
@jackiepoo Love this, elegant analysis of where our governance strengths and weaknesses lie > [@jackiepoo](#): > > my measurement **would capture every time the shadowy super-voter puts their finger on the scale** , and then they would show up among the 9 addresses that decide proposal outcomes. 33 deciding votes suggest you have identified at least one not so shadowy super voter @jackiepoo. And I’d love to see these people recognised as KEY members of our community but (and this is just me guessing) I suspect they might fall on the wrong side of the decentralization argument, and I’m all for decentralization, but not at the cost of isolating ourselves from our key stakeholders (founders/investors/supporters). > [@jackiepoo](#): > > **We can figure out who those 9 people are and make a board out of them if we want to.** If we see single individuals dominating our voting processes, we _can_ try to create a structure that incentivizes transparency and accountability from them. And if the shadowy super-voter never actually dominates a single vote, well, are they really manipulating anything then? Keen to see how the council executes sans board level. But from a communications perspective identifying and engaging with stakeholders is a proven, effective means to build shared understanding and alignment on issues that matter. Even with the [generous move of 1kx to delegate voting](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/index-delegation/3466) power back to the community, I feel we can continue to enhance stakeholder communication, to build context and awareness for us all. Just off the top of my head the communication process could look like developing a feedback loop \> One forum post: meeting agenda, share via newsletter/Scoop, Discord & Telegram, Socials? \> meeting \> forum update: meeting summary, gather community questions for next session, advise next meeting date \> forum update: Meeting agenda… > [@Metfanmike](#): > > This is also happening. There has been an active investor relations effort run by @bax86 where he coordinates calls with these entities: 1kx, Sequoia, Galaxy, etc. Community members have had an open invitation to join these public calls since late summer. Thanks for the heads up on this @Metfanmike this is the first I’ve heard of the meetings with active investors as ongoing (think I’d seen one and thought it was a one-off) perhaps because of my timezone, missing messages in discord? Agree there’s an opportunity to raise awareness of these meetings. @Deronte big fan of liquid democracy, I looked at delegating too, gas fees = reject --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/discussion-centralization-in-index-coop-governance/3425)._