@mrvls_brkfst I think it must account for addresses that have provided liquidity / staked. Otherwise we are missing 40% of the DPI. Also, my crude etherscan analysis found significant addresses holding DPI without moving it (14 addresses holding ~6% of the total DPI at the time)
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Why should I hold $DPI?
|
13 | 3113 | 19 October 2020 | |
| What you can do with your DPI - Extrinsic Productivity | 11 | 5228 | 25 June 2021 | |
|
Indexomics and a suggestion for an experiment
|
6 | 2094 | 21 October 2020 | |
| DPI Product call 27Jan21 - Analysis, IIP-14 for extended liquidity mining and KPI's | 0 | 1624 | 1 February 2021 | |
| [Ongoing Draft] Current state of discussions around DPI product upgrades | 13 | 2388 | 14 December 2020 |