# Framework for Meta-Governance

**URL:** <https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/framework-for-meta-governance/1075>\
**Category:** Meta-Governance\
**Created:** [26 March 2021 18:09 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/framework-for-meta-governance/1075 "2021-03-26T18:09:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![overanalyser](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/gov.indexcoop.com/overanalyser/32/1319_2.png) [@overanalyser](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/overanalyser)\
**Post date:** [27 March 2021 18:28 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/framework-for-meta-governance/1075/5 "2021-03-27T18:28:40Z")

</div>

It’s good to see more thoughts on meta governance.

I’ve been thinking that delegated voting makes sense for the coop (certainly for meta governance). [Implement Governance Mining - #3 by overanalyser](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/implement-governance-mining/746/3) maybe the delegates should receive a bonus on their voting rewards (with a higher threshold?)

I also wonder if we should modify the criteria for meta governance votes, If the snapshot is overwhelming one way or the other, should we allow a lower quorum to pass.

It’s something we and others are developing:

> <https://twitter.com/accel_capital/status/1375863752797474816>

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/framework-for-meta-governance/1075)._