# Governance House

**URL:** <https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/governance-house/4065>\
**Category:** Meta-Governance\
**Tags:** General\
**Created:** [28 March 2022 19:40 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/governance-house/4065 "2022-03-28T19:40:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mel.eth](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/gov.indexcoop.com/mel.eth/32/3539_2.png) [@mel.eth](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/mel.eth)\
**Post date:** [8 April 2022 16:51 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/governance-house/4065/12 "2022-04-08T16:51:42Z")

</div>

> [@JosephKnecht](#):
>
> If there’s one point we can all probably agree on it’s that the forum (while very important) is not the best platform to debate these important issues.

I don’t agree here; it’s pretty clear this is a half-baked idea at best and the proposer hasn’t meaningfully engaged in this forum after 11-days. If the proposer is looking to utilize our established governance process to effect change I recommend they engage here in the governance forum.

I appreciate novel attempts to work through issues, but there’s no issue here and there’s been no attempt by the proposer here to garner support. It’s incumbent upon a proposer to support their idea, not a whole DAO to work through it for them or give them a stage in a DAO leadership forum to do so, especially when they are lying on other governance forums about their new DAO’s standing in relation to Index Coop.

I’ve called on The Index Council [to address](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/how-to-form-a-subdao-at-index-coop-discussion/4130/9).

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/governance-house/4065)._