# IIP-148: Delegate Aave to Governance House EOA Address **URL:** \ **Category:** Governance\ **Tags:** IIP\ **Created:** [5 April 2022 21:38 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-148-delegate-aave-to-governance-house-eoa-address/4122 "2022-04-05T21:38:28Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 7
**Author:** ![funkmasterflex](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/gov.indexcoop.com/funkmasterflex/32/1853_2.png) [@funkmasterflex](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/funkmasterflex)\ **Post date:** [6 April 2022 17:52 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-148-delegate-aave-to-governance-house-eoa-address/4122/7 "2022-04-06T17:52:41Z")
Considering we’ve already delegated Aave tokens previously, I am struggling to understand the pushback. [IIP-124 - Delegate Aave to EOA Address for Cross DAO Polygon Aave Market Changes](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-124-delegate-aave-to-eoa-address-for-cross-dao-polygon-aave-market-changes/3694) We need to move faster as we attempt to partner with the ecosystem. It is shocking to me that proposals that attempt to take action to launch more products and strengthen current offerings are dismissed due to process. While there are some steps to solidify Gov House within IC these actions have already taken place in the past with MGC. I’d also add that Gov House has already begun voting in elections with delegated tokens. I plead that operational inefficiency does not continue to plague growth initiatives. To say “bit of pork” to a proposal that grows Index Coop is ridiculous. This would be a concrete action that helps Product and Growth. This is the type of initiative that Governance Nest should support rather than continuning to be an operational burden. --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-148-delegate-aave-to-governance-house-eoa-address/4122)._