# IIP-53 DPI liquidity Mining - July 2021

**URL:** <https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-53-dpi-liquidity-mining-july-2021/1842>\
**Category:** Proposal\
**Tags:** IIP\
**Created:** [29 June 2021 22:36 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-53-dpi-liquidity-mining-july-2021/1842 "2021-06-29T22:36:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Don-ETH](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/gov.indexcoop.com/don-eth/32/1652_2.png) [@Don-ETH](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/Don-ETH)\
**Post date:** [6 July 2021 08:11 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-53-dpi-liquidity-mining-july-2021/1842/13 "2021-07-06T08:11:46Z")

</div>

Personally, 50% reduction is a better option. I will vote **AGAINST** for this because of the quote below. I believe, the main purpose is LM is to provide better UX (less slippage, etc.) but only having 12% of whale traders being routed to V2 is an indicator that we should stop LM soon.

> [@Liquidity Mining Strategy](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/liquidity-mining-strategy/1570/28):
>
> If we look at 1inch, for large trades (100 ETH), many liquidity sources are used. In this case, **less than 12%** of the total volume was routed through the Uniswap **v2 pool!**

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-53-dpi-liquidity-mining-july-2021/1842)._