# IIP-8 Meta Governance Module **URL:** \ **Category:** Proposal\ **Tags:** IIP\ **Created:** [6 November 2020 22:10 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-8-meta-governance-module/276 "2020-11-06T22:10:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 3
**Author:** ![dylan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e95f7d/32.png) [@dylan](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/dylan)\ **Post date:** [12 November 2020 21:00 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-8-meta-governance-module/276/3 "2020-11-12T21:00:52Z")
> [@Kiba](#): > > more efficient and effective model than the entire coop doing a Snapshot vote since some community members are already getting pretty involved with other DAOs on behalf of the Coop. It’s better to have us represented by real people with reputations and knowledge of each community vs being some abstract juggernaut voting without context on the proposal. The fact that INDEX members will only have info when the vote is called and not knowing anything that led up to the vote plus only a 5% quorum showing we don’t expect most token holders t +1 We have the Treasury Committee structured similarly for some of the same reasons. Having a fairly autonomous sub committee subject to checks and balances makes it much simpler to interface with the coop as a third party. We’ve seen similar sub committees when interfacing with Maker DAO for example. --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-8-meta-governance-module/276)._