# IIP-XX - Two Product DPI Intrinsic Productivity

**URL:** <https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-xx-two-product-dpi-intrinsic-productivity/1628>\
**Category:** Proposal\
**Tags:** IIP\
**Created:** [2 June 2021 19:55 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-xx-two-product-dpi-intrinsic-productivity/1628 "2021-06-02T19:55:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kiba](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/gov.indexcoop.com/kiba/32/1436_2.png) [@Kiba](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/Kiba)\
**Post date:** [2 June 2021 19:55 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-xx-two-product-dpi-intrinsic-productivity/1628/1 "2021-06-02T19:55:27Z")

</div>

iip: XX  
title: Two Product DPI Intrinsic Productivity  
status: Proposed  
author: Kiba Gateaux (@kiba)  
created: 2021-04-01

## Summary

After [IIP-29](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-29-activate-dpi-intrinsic-productivity/1118) DG1 vote and community feedback on calls and [1 vs 2 product solution RFC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/request-for-discussion-activate-intrinsic-productivity-ip-for-dpi-as-a-standalone-product/1591) it seems the best solution for everyone in the coop is having two separate index products for Intrinsic Productivity to preserve DPIs market potential. The a second product / Set token will follow DPI methodology and puts assets to work underneath. Same fees and fees split as DPI.

Moving this to a new IIP to make it clear that the change has occurred since it’s fairly major

_Poll ([view on site](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-xx-two-product-dpi-intrinsic-productivity/1628/1))_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0xModene](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/gov.indexcoop.com/0xmodene/32/3070_2.png) [@0xModene](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/0xModene)\
**Post date:** [3 June 2021 12:49 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-xx-two-product-dpi-intrinsic-productivity/1628/2 "2021-06-03T12:49:15Z")

</div>

ooo a contentious vote, looking good

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon10525910](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/97f17d/32.png) [@anon10525910](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/anon10525910)\
**Post date:** [3 June 2021 23:44 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-xx-two-product-dpi-intrinsic-productivity/1628/3 "2021-06-03T23:44:31Z")

</div>

Putting on my “IIP Editor” hat 🤓

If you expect this to actually turn into an IIP that eventually reaches Snapshot, do please  
use the proposal template here: [Gitbook-IIP Template](https://docs.indexcoop.com/index-improvement-proposals/iip-template)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kiba](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/gov.indexcoop.com/kiba/32/1436_2.png) [@Kiba](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/Kiba)\
**Post date:** [4 June 2021 12:56 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-xx-two-product-dpi-intrinsic-productivity/1628/4 "2021-06-04T12:56:50Z")

</div>

It’s IIIP-29 except exactly one line is changing. Just seemed like overkill to copy paste everything again but can do it if necessary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon10525910](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/97f17d/32.png) [@anon10525910](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/anon10525910)\
**Post date:** [4 June 2021 16:30 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-xx-two-product-dpi-intrinsic-productivity/1628/5 "2021-06-04T16:30:01Z")

</div>

Yup, it is necessary to ensure clarity & understanding for all $INDEX voters.

Thanks for the flexibility 🙌

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thomas\_Hepner](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/gov.indexcoop.com/thomas_hepner/32/111_2.png) [@Thomas\_Hepner](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/Thomas_Hepner)\
**Post date:** [4 June 2021 16:56 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/iip-xx-two-product-dpi-intrinsic-productivity/1628/6 "2021-06-04T16:56:21Z")

</div>

Agreed. I like putting a **Summary** section of what has changed at the top too. @Kiba fyi