# Index 2.0 | Leadership, Governance and Decision Making (Pods, Nest and Index Council)

**URL:** https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/index-2-0-leadership-governance-and-decision-making-pods-nest-and-index-council/3214
**Category:** Change
**Created:** [16 November 2021 00:13 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/index-2-0-leadership-governance-and-decision-making-pods-nest-and-index-council/3214 "2021-11-16T00:13:59Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Cavalier\_Eth](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/gov.indexcoop.com/cavalier_eth/32/1873_2.png) [@Cavalier\_Eth](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/Cavalier_Eth)
#### Post date: [18 November 2021 05:04 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/index-2-0-leadership-governance-and-decision-making-pods-nest-and-index-council/3214/16 "2021-11-18T05:04:39Z")

</div>

What a gargantuan effort bringing this together. THIS is an example of us living up to our reputation as one of the most considered and progressive DAOs 👏

Index Coop is at an inflection point, where we could stagnate due to circular bureaucracy, or rally and evolve into a more robust organization. The process we are going through is uncomfortable and intimidating, because we care deeply about building something bigger than ourselves, and want to get it right, but we can’t let fear or perfectionism get in the way of us taking action.

I am FOR this proposal as an assertive step towards an organization that can make decisions, and act with conviction. As I mentioned in [It's time to BUIDL 🤝](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/its-time-to-buidl/3220) :

> [@It's time to BUIDL handshake](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/its-time-to-buidl/3220/1):
>
> We are at a much greater risk of the downsides of not making decisions (lost time, opportunity, and people) than making poor decisions. We have a brilliant collection of people, and like every startup we are in a race; consensus is our enemy disguised as “everyone needs to be on board”, and speed is our friend but requires greater levels of trust and communication.

The proposed Nest and Wise Owl framework is a well though out experiment, that can drive us towards action. We have a ripcord if the Wise Owls don’t perform, which means that either lots of decisions get made, or Wise Owls are removed.

* * *

> [@overanalyser](#):
>
> On IIP’s, I’m not sure I want to give the wise owls a veto on proposed / or passed IIP’s.
> 
> However, we have seen IIP’s that could have been better prepared/discussed before voting (and I’ve been guilty of this on occasion). I think one solution could be:
> 
> - Wise owls should discuss and publically comment on any IIP proposals before they goto vote. If they say “We support this proposal, or we think this is bad because of x, y and z” and INDEX holders vote differently then we need to have some serious strategic discussions. [Obviously the wise owls can say, “We think this is a key decision and defer to the INDEX vote”]
> - We need a process to recall / replace IIP’s that have not been implemented. I think giving the wise owls the responsibility to say “On review, implementing IIP-XXX would no benefit INDEX coop for reasons x,y, and z.”. Then we should have a snapshot to confirm the recall.

I agree with @overanalyser, and am AGAINST IIP veto power. Veto on IIPs is a slippery slope, and I support his description of softer power to transparently influence the voters.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/index-2-0-leadership-governance-and-decision-making-pods-nest-and-index-council/3214)._