I agree, and to copy some of my comment on DPI:
I see the liquidity mining strategy comprising 3 pillars:
- L1 Pool size required for trades without undue price slippage
- Liquidity to maintain market dominace in a sector.
- Liquidity to promote adoption of L2’s etc.
Until now we have used Uni v2 to address #1 and #2.
With the advent of uni v3 and more side chains / L2’s there are many more options to work with.
Looking forward I see #1 as being more of a PWG responsibility and likely utilising Uni v3 , while #2 and #3 migrate towards Growth and BD and using different approaches.
However, there are going to be some interaction we need to consider (what happens when we have more liquidity on L2 than on L1 
)
PWG have a work team looking at Uni v3, and how it impacts the coop’s product/liquidity mining.
I’m hoping to develop/discuss and agree on a new framework for liquidity requirements / provision before the end of the 90 day campaigns we have running on MVI and DPI (i.e. before the end of June) for implementation in July.
In terms of current trade sizes, I’m currently doing DPI on uni v2 and v3, and will do MVI v2 this week.