# \*\*Poll Added\*\* Proposal: Analytics Working Group (AWG) \[Q4 2021\]

**URL:** <https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/poll-added-proposal-analytics-working-group-awg-q4-2021/2895>\
**Category:** Proposal\
**Created:** [6 October 2021 23:56 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/poll-added-proposal-analytics-working-group-awg-q4-2021/2895 "2021-10-06T23:56:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon10525910](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/97f17d/32.png) [@anon10525910](https://gov.indexcoop.com/u/anon10525910)\
**Post date:** [7 October 2021 16:13 UTC](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/poll-added-proposal-analytics-working-group-awg-q4-2021/2895/7 "2021-10-07T16:13:47Z")

</div>

Brief table setting

- I’m putting on my “Funding Council” hat to pose questions (See [Q4 Working Group Guidance](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/q4-working-group-guidance/2743)to learn more about Working Group proposals)
- My intent is to ask the questions that ping in my mind with the hope that they help the entire Coop better understand the proposal and thinking behind it.
- Questions are pretty much posed in the order the topic appears in the post.
- If a question doesn’t make sense or is entirely off-base, do call it out 🙂

* * *

> [@jdcook](#):
>
> 3 months ending on Oct 1, 2021

No need to change this, just noting that im assuming it’s “ending Dec. 31, 2021”

> [@jdcook](#):
>
> We are on pace to support 10+ products by the end of 2021

Is there anything foundational you believe needs to be done/changed in order to support this # of products from an analytics point-of-view?

Put another way, are there any current/core ways we do things at the Coop that are going to break at that scale?

> [@jdcook](#):
>
> Between those core contributors and myself, we plan to work with existing working group and pod leaders to develop a quarterly analytics roadmap - a prioritization of the key initiatives that analytics will support and drive across the whole Coop.

Something similar (shifting to a pro-active stance), seems to be happening with EWG too.

What is needed from the Coop community in order to support the AWG’s desired shift to being pro-active?

> [@jdcook](#):
>
> While the key projects/tasks will eventually will be determined in concert with working group and pod leads, my early inclinations of where AWG will focus its time and efforts are:

It seems like the areas of focus are broadly…

- Product
  - Building and maintaining new Simple Index KPIs, research
  - Building and maintaining new Leverage Index KPIs, research
  - Supporting Work Team Analysis with Market Opportunity research prior to DG2
  - Liquidity strategy and management
  - Layer 2 strategy
  - New product backtesting, simulation

- Treasury
  - Index Coop Live Financial Statement

- Growth, broadly speaking (BD & IB & Growth)
  - Building and maintaining Coop KPIs
  - Business Development analytics dashboard
  - Institutional Business attribution experiments
  - Growth - personas, attribution, and experiments

- Engineering
  - Index Coop subgraph (in partnership with EWG)

- POC
  - Community analytics (discord, forums, etc)

Are there are areas of focus that I’m missing? Am I thinking about this ^ incorrectly?

> [@jdcook](#):
>
> Requests can be made by any community member

How are requests made?

> Looking at [Request for Feedback: Index Coop KPIs v2.0](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/request-for-feedback-index-coop-kpis-v2-0/2733)

Is continuing to work on “v2” growth KPIs a priority?

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.indexcoop.com/t/poll-added-proposal-analytics-working-group-awg-q4-2021/2895)._
