Hey @dylan - this is amazing news! @Kiba and I are so excited to launch DATA so it’s a relief to hear that Engineering is no longer a constraint for simple indices in such a short period of time. Thank you @dylan , Set Labs, and EWG for your great work and for sharing an update in this forum post. 
Now, a question!
After conversations with you, @oneski22 , and @Kiba and reading through this past forum post and subsequent comments here, here, and here , Titans of Data did some research and believes that changing the fee structure from standard 95 bps to 50 bps (streaming), 10 bps (mint) and 20 bps (redeem) will increase revenue for DATA by ~50% without sacrificing TVL or growth. See our analysis.
There was some confusion in the Work Team Analysis Discord channel for DATA about the difficulty of implementing these changes for simple index products.
Could you provide context on feasibility?
Tagging @puniaviision as he had thought discussing engineering requirements for DATA before the methodologist compensation negotiations took place was premature, but I think those will take longer than we had initially anticipated after receiving community feedback.