If you are referring to the month long extension of liquidity mining of DPI:ETH uniswap. Then yes, I am for that.
My oreference would be to use all DPI streaming fees to fund the coop treasury until we get a solid buffer.
INDEX token value is volatile and we have a fixed supply.
We want (and need) to distribute INDEX tokens - otherwise we don’t become decentralised and that puts the founders at risk.
I think that using INDEX to maintain a MASSIVE liquidity is useful as it will encourage long term actions that benefit us:
Added as collateral by Maker and AAVE
Ownership of DPI by other DAO’s (YAM)
Purchase by large retail (who need to be assured of exit liquidity).
However, I don’t want to give away INDEX without the coop getting some benefit (community building, methodologists, liquidity), and I’m not looking to pump the price by incentivise the L2 pool.
The aim of my recent post was to use sparingly INDEX to promote activities we want (lockup of DPI and liquidity) while building the none INDEX reserves. The experiment would also result in building new contracts to allow intrinsic yield from DPI and future funds and server as a proof of concept.
Giving DPI (or INDEX) to INDEX holders / stakers who carry no risk does much less to secure the long term development of our contracts and understanding of customer behavior and leaves us with a single asset reserve fund (INDEX),