Gm @funkmasterflex -
- Please specify ^here with more detail (how many AIPs, relevant details/spec of each, and when is this expected to conclude so the delegation can be returned to IC). Of note, there is no specification section provided in this proposal; will one be added prior to calling for a vote (copy of IIP template can be found here)?
-
Will GH be providing execution of regular votes during this time? In my view this would be required as we cannot halt normal metagovernance operations for an undefined timeframe.
-
Are you a member of GH @funkmasterflex? Who specifically will have access to the wallet/multisig that controls the EOA? Does GH or its members have a history of proven execution, and can some support be provided?
-
Can you go into some more detail on why IC metagov should be used for the non-IC asset(s) you propose listing?
-
Would GH be willing to set up a regular touchpoint with GovNest to increase working communication and alignment for this partnership, especially during the GH delegation-phase, should this come to pass? Who would be the best person to contact to set that up if so?
The intention here isn’t to bog anything down, quite the opposite; given this is our first foray into delegating for a batch of proposals I’d really like to make sure this is well established as a process to mitigate any snags such as the Flipside delegation. Thanks!