Thanks for the vote of confidence, OA.
I would agree with this. From my perspective, we have a good handle on the methodology for assessing risk, and we are able to proceed through the process of updating parameters quickly enough to grow the products and communicate our understanding. We haven’t received any pushback on any updates, but I would be very interested to know what people think about the process so far. What can we improve on from the community’s perspective etc.
I would agree that we could improve visibility around our decision making and provide it in a more digestible format to the community. A serious discussion in pod right now is how we can improve this. A lot of time and work in this early stage was focused on getting up to speed with the task, but now that we have more confidence and experience in the process, I believe we will be able to vastly improve communications around parameter changes, and risk management in general, in the very near future.
I would also add that the system in place works fine for 2 FLI products, but in the very near future where we may have 5-10 products, it could be too inefficient to work at that scale.
Again, this is a major focus in the team right now and we hope to be able to present a massive overhaul to the process in the coming months.