diving rrrrright on into question/notes 
Question one is the biggie and then the rest dig into the the role of the TWG.
Questions
Supposing this proposal as-is gets voted in, what is the impact for the Coop? Is it simply, “two, empty multi-sig addresses will exist”?
- If this is simply the case 1) my below-questions may be moot for this proposal 2) it seems like we can expect a subsequent proposal that covers funding amounts & responsibilities & the sunsetting of the Treasury Wallet
Given that many of the payments below (via (TWG - Operations Account) aren’t actually happening today (smart treasury, distribution of rewards as stablecoins, KPI rewards, etc.)
- Is approving this IIP approving those unexecuted programs?
- What specifically is the Operations account responsible for funding?
- Is the TWG Operations account a decision making body that decides what gets funded? Or is it a guidance body that shares the impact of potential spending? (or some other option I’m missing)
Which responsibilities are being transitioned from* the Treasury Committee to the TWG?
I’m a bit hazy on the motivation
- What is the motivation behind this? In the explanation above I see mentions of the Treasury Committee, the Treasury Wallet, overseeing Coop finances, a deep dive on Gnosis multi sigs and more
Confirming understanding
Under this proposal, the TWG Operations account will control the following payments
- Methodologist Rewards
- Smart Treasury
- Liquidity Mining Framework
- Full Time Employee Package
- Distribution of Community Rewards in Stable Coins, wETH & INDEX
- Contributor Token Ownership Plan
- KPI Rewards Program
- Governance Mining
- Working Groups
Source: TWG - Operations Account