I think this proposal is definitely the way to go.
One option for governing I hadn’t considered was creating an autonomous subgroup that would manage all inter-dao voting which was listed in this Yearn post. I don’t think it would work for us since not all the governance tokens can’t be delegated so some would still need Coop multisig while others need the subgroup multisig which makes it a bit messy.
If it were possible to delegate all tokens than its probably a more efficient and effective model than the entire coop doing a Snapshot vote since some community members are already getting pretty involved with other DAOs on behalf of the Coop. It’s better to have us represented by real people with reputations and knowledge of each community vs being some abstract juggernaut voting without context on the proposal. The fact that INDEX members will only have info when the vote is called and not knowing anything that led up to the vote plus only a 5% quorum showing we don’t expect most token holders to care or know enough to affect results makes me think a delegate subgroup would give better results for the other DAO we are participating in which is our objective with meta-governance.
But I’m pretty sure it’s not feasible to do the subgroup option since some governance tokens can’t be delegated so this proposal is the best solution as far as I can tell.