Looks like there was an error in one of the parameters of this proposal:
The LM reward amount that was deployed to MVI for IIP-24 was 3810 INDEX, not 5700 INDEX.
Therefore, a 28% reduction should target 2743 INDEX instead of 4447 INDEX.
Looks like there was an error in one of the parameters of this proposal:
The LM reward amount that was deployed to MVI for IIP-24 was 3810 INDEX, not 5700 INDEX.
Therefore, a 28% reduction should target 2743 INDEX instead of 4447 INDEX.