Brief Table setting
- I’m putting on my “Funding Council” hat to pose questions (See Q4 Working Group Guidance to learn more about Working Group proposals)
- My intent is to ask the questions that ping in my mind with the hope that they help the entire Coop better understand the proposal and thinking behind it.
- Questions are pretty much posed in the order the topic appears in the post
- If a question doesn’t make sense or is entirely off-base, do call it out
Noting that some version of the question, “why is the Working Group structure the right one for bootstrapping growth of a new product?” has already been posed and that respectful discussion is ongoing,
Instead, the question I’ll add to (hopefully) help sharpen the discussion is
→ Let’s assume that the RIWG doesn’t get approved, how would impact iRobot (should it pass DG2)?
Just clarifying questions! So if my understanding is right
- $6000 per month for 1 leader
- If iRobot hits the following thresholds during Q4…
- $5m AUM → $1K bonus
- $10m AUM → $1K bonus
- $15m AUM → $1K bonus
- $20m AUM → $1k bonus
- Capped - $10K cap hit (6K stipend + 4K bonus)
Am I getting that right?
On this section as a whole…
How do you envision the RIWG complementing the relevant WG’s that are also focused on marketing/growth/product development/data analysis?