@kindeagle This is the same advice I referenced above for the results of voting, undetaken due to lack of concesus and community support for the proposal to which they are applied. The only applicable information on the referenced post is the results of the vote.
Results of voting show concensus YES to six month terms, sans any reference to retroctive application.
Imo six month term should be applied as of v2 moving forward to establish a level playing feild.
Maybe it was intended to apply retrospectively but that is not what we voted YES to.
We voted YES simply to a maximum two consecutive six month term and NO to automatic roll over, as the votes relating to length of tenure.
We can not maintain the legitamacy of those results while also reinterprerting their application.
The opportunity to specify that the six month term would have a retroactive application was excluded at voting.