Brief table setting
- I’m putting on my “Funding Council” hat to pose questions (See Q4 Working Group Guidance to learn more about Working Group proposals)
- My intent is to ask the questions that ping in my mind with the hope that they help the entire Coop better understand the proposal and thinking behind it.
- Questions are pretty much posed in the order the topic appears in the post.
- If a question doesn’t make sense or is entirely off-base, do call it out
No need to change this, just noting that im assuming it’s “ending Dec. 31, 2021”
Is there anything foundational you believe needs to be done/changed in order to support this # of products from an analytics point-of-view?
Put another way, are there any current/core ways we do things at the Coop that are going to break at that scale?
Something similar (shifting to a pro-active stance), seems to be happening with EWG too.
What is needed from the Coop community in order to support the AWG’s desired shift to being pro-active?
It seems like the areas of focus are broadly…
- Product
- Building and maintaining new Simple Index KPIs, research
- Building and maintaining new Leverage Index KPIs, research
- Supporting Work Team Analysis with Market Opportunity research prior to DG2
- Liquidity strategy and management
- Layer 2 strategy
- New product backtesting, simulation
- Treasury
- Index Coop Live Financial Statement
- Growth, broadly speaking (BD & IB & Growth)
- Building and maintaining Coop KPIs
- Business Development analytics dashboard
- Institutional Business attribution experiments
- Growth - personas, attribution, and experiments
- Engineering
- Index Coop subgraph (in partnership with EWG)
- POC
- Community analytics (discord, forums, etc)
Are there are areas of focus that I’m missing? Am I thinking about this ^ incorrectly?
How are requests made?
Looking at Request for Feedback: Index Coop KPIs v2.0
Is continuing to work on “v2” growth KPIs a priority?