gm @ElliottWatts -
You may find this response to your previous post helpful.
Given @Metfanmike is the affected party and you seem to be lobbying on his behalf, I’d recommend reaching out directly and coordinating an effort to communicate wrt term-length as these previously addressed calls for clarity on a topic that’s well in hand by all other parties are more akin to direct communication at this stage. By way of explanation, the conception of the v1.0 council that determined the polling for this was around a complete 6-month term for v1.0, not two 3-moth terms, but regardless of intent @Metfanmike’s term ends on 31 May 2022 as publicly posted above and acknowledged by @Metfanmike again separately for extreme clarity on the matter.